Nano Banana 2.0 vs Midjourney vs DALL·E ｜img2img AI
Nano Banana 2.0 vs Midjourney vs DALL·E: Who Really Wins on Text, Logic, and Detail?
Choosing an AI image generator in 2025 can feel like choosing a streaming service: too many good options, not enough time.
On one side, Nano Banana 2.0 (and siblings like Nano Banana Pro) promise 4K images, better text handling, and multi-step “planning” that feels like an assistant sketching and refining for you.
On another, Midjourney keeps dropping increasingly impressive versions famous for rich textures, cinematic lighting, and artistic flair.
And then there’s DALL·E and the newer GPT-4-style image tools, tightly integrated into chat interfaces where you’re already writing content.
So in a real-world Nano Banana 2.0 vs Midjourney vs DALL·E comparison, what should you actually use?
Let’s break it down by what really matters: text in images, visual logic, style and detail, workflow, and commercial use.
1. The Three Models in One Glance
Nano Banana 2.0 / Nano Banana Pro
Built on modern Gemini image capabilities.
Designed for 2K–4K output, sharper text, better perspective, and multi-step internal planning.
Often exposed through marketing/design tools or as an “image” option in Gemini-powered UIs.
Great for marketers, founders, and designers who need clean, practical visuals.
Midjourney (Latest Version)
Runs mainly on Discord and a dedicated web app.
Famous for artistic, highly aesthetic images—from dream-like concept art to hyper-detailed pseudo-photography.
Offers features like style references, image prompts, and community feeds full of examples.
DALL·E / GPT-4-Era Image Tools
Integrated into chat products like ChatGPT.
Very strong at understanding nuanced prompts and following detailed instructions.
Ideal for people who want to brainstorm, write, and generate images in one place.
All three can make impressive images. The differences show up when you look more closely at what you’re trying to do.
2. Text in Images: Posters, UI, and Infographics
Text has always been one of the hardest problems for image models. Let’s see how each one fares.
Nano Banana 2.0
Nano Banana 2.0 and the Pro-tier models are specifically optimized for:
Readable headings and labels.
Multi-language text.
Better alignment of text inside posters, simple UI mockups, and infographics.
You can ask for things like:
“Poster with big title at the top and date at the bottom.”
“Infographic with three labeled steps.”
“Mobile app screen with clear button text.”
You’ll still want to refine in a design tool for mission-critical graphics, but Nano Banana’s text is generally more reliable than older generation models.
Midjourney
Midjourney has improved text, but it’s still not its main superpower. The focus is visuals first; text is a nice bonus. For posters and thumbnails, many creators:
Generate the artwork in Midjourney.
Add the final typography in Photoshop, Figma, or Canva.
If text is central to your image, Midjourney will often need extra cleanup work.
DALL·E / GPT-4 Image
DALL·E-style tools are surprisingly good at text, especially short phrases, titles, and labels. Paired with strong language understanding, they often follow instructions like “use the words ‘AI Productivity Masterclass’ at the top” fairly well.
Bottom line on text:
If you care a lot about infographics, slide graphics, UI mockups, or posters, Nano Banana 2.0 and Nano Banana Pro are usually the safest bet.
DALL·E / GPT-4 image is a close second with the advantage of being deeply integrated into chat.
Midjourney is still great, but expect to finish typography manually.
3. Visual Logic: Does the Image Make Sense?
We don’t just want pretty pictures—we want pictures that respect basic logic:
Clocks show the time we asked for.
A chart has the same number of bars in text and image.
A character looks consistent in multiple shots.
Nano Banana 2.0’s Planning Approach
Nano Banana 2.0 tends to “think in stages”: plan a layout, fill in details, and refine. In practice, that often means:
Better consistency in multi-object scenes.
More sensible layouts for diagrams and UI.
Fewer wild perspective errors when you edit a specific area.
It feels like an assistant that drafts the composition, checks it, then paints.
Midjourney’s Coherent Scenes
Midjourney shines at overall coherence in complex scenes:
Crowded markets, busy streets, elaborate fantasy battles.
Characters with recognizable anatomy and expressions.
Lighting that feels physically plausible even in surreal images.
It may not “explain” its reasoning, but the images often look like they could be concept art from a high-end studio.
DALL·E / GPT-4 Image
DALL·E-style tools benefit from strong symbolic reasoning:
They’re good at attribute binding—things like “a red cube on a blue sphere”.
They can handle flowchart-like or diagram-ish prompts fairly well.
Combined with text, you can iterate logically: “move the second box to the left”, “make the arrow thicker”, etc.
Bottom line on logic:
For structured visuals (infographics, UI, diagrams), Nano Banana 2.0 is very strong.
For complex artistic scenes, Midjourney still feels like the king.
For reasoned, conversational tweaking, DALL·E / GPT-4 image is very comfortable.
4. Detail, Style, and Overall Visual Quality
This is usually the part people care about the most.
Nano Banana 2.0 / Pro: Clean and Practical
Nano Banana models usually aim for:
Crisp detail at 2K and 4K.
Realistic lighting suitable for marketing images.
Styles that don’t overwhelm your brand (great for B2B, SaaS, and corporate use).
A lot of Nano Banana images look like stock photos or polished marketing art—on purpose.
Midjourney: Artistic and Dramatic
Midjourney tends to:
Push style, texture, and mood hard.
Produce images that look like concept art, magazine covers, or experimental photography.
Respond strongly to style cues (“Ghibli-inspired”, “oil painting”, “photoreal cyberpunk city”, etc.).
If you want people to say “whoa” when they see the image, Midjourney is hard to beat.
DALL·E / GPT-4 Image: Flexible All-Rounder
DALL·E and GPT-4-era tools aim to be:
Visually strong in many styles without a single “signature look”.
Very responsive to conversational re-prompting (“more pastel”, “make it flatter”, “make it look like a slide illustration”).
They’re especially good when your text prompt is long and nuanced.
Bottom line on style:
Want clean, brand-safe marketing visuals? Nano Banana 2.0 / Pro.
Want artsy, dramatic, portfolio-ready art? Midjourney.
Want flexible images tied closely to written content? DALL·E / GPT-4 image.
5. Speed, Workflow, and Control
Nano Banana 2.0 Workflows
You’ll often see Nano Banana 2.0 or Pro inside:
Content marketing platforms.
Slide or design tools.
Custom dashboards where you can generate, edit, and upscale in one place.
Pros:
Strong fit for business workflows (blog + social images, ad sets, decks).
Good controls for aspect ratios, resolutions, and batch outputs.
Cons:
Less of a big public community to copy prompts from, compared to Midjourney.
Midjourney Workflows
Midjourney’s strengths:
Huge community posting prompts and results.
Support for style references, image prompts, and variations.
Web gallery for browsing and remixing.
Cons:
If you dislike Discord or hopping between windows, it can feel clunky.
Exporting at very high resolutions sometimes takes extra steps.
DALL·E / GPT-4 Workflows
These tools shine when:
You’re already writing in a chat interface.
You want to generate illustrations alongside scripts, blog posts, or lesson plans.
You prefer conversational revisions over rewriting prompts.
Cons:
Fewer “knobs and sliders” compared to specialized dashboards.
High-resolution export options vary by product tier.
Bottom line on workflow:
If you want a structured marketing pipeline, Nano Banana 2.0 / Pro fits nicely.
For creative exploration and prompt-hacking, Midjourney is a playground.
For writing-centric workflows, DALL·E / GPT-4 image inside chat is incredibly convenient.
6. Safety, Licensing, and Commercial Use
Short version: always read the terms for the exact platform you use. But broadly:
Nano Banana 2.0 platforms generally allow commercial use for paying users and often attach metadata or watermarks indicating AI origin.
Midjourney offers commercial rights for paid subscribers under its own license.
DALL·E / GPT-4 image services usually allow commercial use under standard terms, with content policies about prohibited uses.
For any high-stakes campaign:
Check your plan’s license (free vs paid tiers can differ).
Avoid imitating specific artists or brands too closely.
Make sure you’re following your company’s policies on AI content.
7. Which One Should You Choose?
Here’s a practical way to decide.
Pick Nano Banana 2.0 / Nano Banana Pro if…
You care about readable text, clean layouts, and 4K export.
Your work leans toward infographics, product shots, UI mockups, and slide images.
You want something that fits neatly into a business or marketing workflow.
Pick Midjourney if…
You want jaw-dropping art and don’t mind some prompt experimentation.
You enjoy hanging out in creative communities and learning by remixing.
You’re creating concept art, mood boards, or highly stylized social posts.
Pick DALL·E / GPT-4 Image if…
You already write scripts, posts, or lessons in a chat interface.
You want to say, “Here’s my idea; generate an image to match this paragraph.”
You prefer conversation over tweaking sliders.
8. FAQ: Nano Banana 2.0 vs Midjourney vs DALL·E
Which is best for social media content?
For polished, brand-safe visuals with text and diagrams: Nano Banana 2.0 / Pro.
For highly artistic, eye-candy posts: Midjourney.
For content where images are tightly tied to long text (e.g., threads, articles): DALL·E / GPT-4.
Which is best for logos and branding?
None of them should be your final logo tool, but:
Nano Banana 2.0 / Pro and DALL·E / GPT-4 are better for clean, simple shapes.
Final logos should always be redrawn as vectors by a designer.
Which is fastest?
Performance depends on server load and resolution. Nano Banana 2.0 tools often emphasize speed and efficiency; Midjourney and DALL·E platforms are also optimized for quick results, especially at default resolutions.
Can I mix them?
Absolutely. Many creators:
Explore wild ideas in Midjourney.
Rebuild clean marketing versions in Nano Banana Pro / 2.0.
Generate diagrams or teaching visuals in DALL·E / GPT-4 while writing content.
Instead of searching for a single “winner,” think of them as different lenses. For each project, ask:
Do I need art, clarity, or conversation?
Art → Midjourney
Clarity → Nano Banana 2.0 / Pro
Conversation → DALL·E / GPT-4 image
Once you know that, picking the right tool becomes a lot easier.